Can you guys tell me what is better about jac than cdcd? just curious. I didn't find the jac program to be any more responsive than cdcd while inside the console and it exhibitted the same fatal problem I got with cdcd once when the scsi device somehow got hung and I had to meat axe the thing to recover my system. For some reason, if I strictly stick with the command line and don't stick around inside the interactive console I won't hang the scsi interface. On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Charles Hallenbeck wrote: > > Jim - > > I made the substitution "freedb.freedb.org" in the source code at > the line you indicated, recompiled, and now it works like a charm > again! Thanks to Kerry for the working URL. > Chuck > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 jwantz at hpcc2.hpcc.noaa.gov wrote: > > > Hi Chuck and Steve, > > Well, when I started using Jac version 0.15 the cddb feature worked fine. > > That's why I know the current problems are caused by changes on the server > > end rather than anything wrong with jac. Maybe "cddb.freedb.org" will > > work. I'll be persistent. When I find out anything I'll let you know. > > > > 73s > > Jim Wantz WB0TFK > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > *<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>* > Visit me now at http://www.valstar.net/~hallenbeck > The Moon is Waning Gibbous (79% of Full) > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >
