Yes, I tend to disagree here too because I know that Artic BusinessVision will allow you to query the exact row and column of the cursor as well as there are keystrokes as well as the use of the numberpad to read character, word, line sentance and paragraph. JAWS for DOS does similar functions. I'm sure that the DOS versions of GW's products do similar functions as well so don't know where folks got this mis-conception but this is mixing apples and oranges. I believe the version should be 1.0 and go forward. Amanda Lee Alexandria, VA On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Gregory Nowak wrote: > Give me an example of a DOS screenreader > like that in an editor. > I'm interested to hear of one now, maybe I'll relent > on that issue after all. > Greg > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:10:04PM -0500, Adam Myrow wrote: > > Given that many DOS screen readers don't automatically read where you are > > in every application, I have to say let's call Speakup version 1.0. It's > > got a lot of features that make it a good choice, not the least of which > > is that it comes up talking from the beginning. Many people give more > > respect to a 1.0 or 2.0 product than a 0.10A product. That's my vote. > > Oh, I got Brltty and Speakup working together. They make a good, pair. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >
