software speech for speakup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



well, bugger it! I agree chuck.

Shaun..
"Has anyone ever tasted an "END"? Are they really bitter?"
EMAIL: shauno at goanna.net.au ICQ: 76958435
YAHOO ID: blindman01_2000 IRC NICK/SERVER: |3|1ndm4n on #aussiefriends on
www.jong.com:6667

On Thu, 17 May 2001, Charles Hallenbeck wrote:

> This discussion is improving as it proceeds, I think!
> 
> One more factor to consider is the desirability of offloading peripheral
> tasks to peripheral processors so that the central processor(s) do not
> have to service absolutely everything that happens inside the
> cabinet. Input-Output tasks are ideal candidates for offloading from the
> CPU. That is done in IDE devices, in video cards, in real modems (as
> opposed to Win modems), in keystroke processing inside the keyboard,
> etcetera. Software speech synthesis is a fairly heavy duty processing
> load, and if it can be handed off to an 80186 or whatever, that is very
> good news for the CPU.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> My web site is http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh 
> The Moon is Waning Crescent (30% of Full)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux