I agree with that also. windows9x don't use dynamic memory allocation. this means that the stack is prone to becoming fragmented. and that is why windblows9x falles over more often than it's nt counterpart. all breeds of unix and windows nt/2000 all use dynamic memory allocation so as to give us the advantage of longer uptime. and a less fragmented stack, thus fewer crashes or lockups. Shaun.. "We realise we have a problem with communication. However, we're not going to discuss it with our staff." EMAIL: shauno at goanna.net.au ICQ: 76958435 YAHOO ID: blindman01_2000 IRC NICK/SERVER: |3|1ndm4n on #aussiefriends on www.jong.com:6667 On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Ann Parsons wrote: > Hi all, > > <nodding vigorously> That isn't or wasn't ASAW's fault, that, my dear > friend is the fault of Windblows OS, especially win95. > > Ann P. > > -- > Ann K. Parsons > email: akp at eznet.net ICQ Number: 33006854 > WEB SITE: http://home.eznet.net/~akp > "All that is gold does not glitter. Not all those who wander are lost." JRRT > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >