Hi Kirk, read an earlier post of yours, I also have a blind friend. My statement is referring to the Windows C.E. O/S not the C language. I think the Palm O/S is well suited for an audio interface compared to Windows C.E. O/S because the all applications on the Windows C.E. O/S have to work through the Windows GUI. Greg Keto Kirk Reiser wrote: > > Greg Keto <gorgotek at gte.net> writes: > > > I can't see a pda audio interface being done right in any O/S other > > than the palm O/S, CE is out of the question, why should an audio > > Hi Greg: I would be interested in hearing your reasoning with respect > to the above points. I don't know the Palm O/S but it seems to me > that an audio interface or any other interface shouldn't be better or > worse than any other OS. I particularly don't understand why you > think C is out of the question. With a good compiler like gcc you > can create better tighter code than you can in assembler if you're > not an experienced assembler programmer. > > Kirk > > -- > > Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility > e-mail: kirk at braille.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario > phone: (519) 661-3061
