On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 3:58 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Folks! > References: <20220606194042.428568932@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Based on the normalized pattern: > > this program is free software you can redistribute it and/or modify it > under the terms of version 2 of the gnu general public license as > published by the free software foundation this program is distributed > in the hope that it will be useful all express or implied conditions > representations and warranties including any implied warranty of > merchantability fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement > are disclaimed except to the extent that such disclaimers are held to > be legally invalid see the gnu general public license for more details > a copy of which can be found in the file copying included with this > package I forget how we dealt with things like this in the initial large batch some years ago but I remember raising the concern that some bespoke license notices contained disclaimer language that was arguably materially different in some way from what is found in GPLv2 itself. This might be another example. I think in some such cases we at least considered preserving the nonstandard disclaimer language. Richard
