On 16 12月 21 13:17:35, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Some files have been flagged with the new LGPL-2.1-or-later > identifier which replace the original LGPL-2.1+ in the SPDX license > identifier specification, but the identifiers are not mentioned as > valid in the LGPL-2.1 license file. > > Add it, together with the LGPL-2.1-only at the the license file. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 b/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 > index 27bb4342a3e8..b73f9b6230f5 100644 > --- a/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 > +++ b/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 > @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ > Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1 > +Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-only > Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+ > +Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later > SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/LGPL-2.1.html The URL is deprecated, do we need to update it together. The same, GPL-2.0, LGPL-2.0 > Usage-Guide: > To use this license in source code, put one of the following SPDX > -- > 2.33.1 >
