Re: [COX patch 1/2] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard,

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019, Richard Fontana wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:39 AM Steve Winslow
> <swinslow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I'd suggest this might be a good example of one where we want to (1)
> > still add the SPDX tag, but (2) leave the existing notice text in
> > place and wrap it in something like a NOTICE_BEGIN / NOTICE END block.
> >
> > The specific reference to individual / entity, plus the non-standard
> > language about e.g. not admitting liability, makes me think that it's
> > better to leave this in place. I do think GPL-2.0-or-later is the
> > right tag but I'm inclined not to delete the notice altogether.
> 
> I agree that the "Neither ... " paragraph should be kept in (I don't
> have an opinion on whether wrapping it in such a block is preferable).

The delimiter wrapping is useful in two aspects:

  1) It's simpler for tools

  2) It's trivial to grep for custom disclaimers without having knowledge
     of potential keywords.

Thanks,

	tglx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux