On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 01:30:24PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > > On 03.06.19 07:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > --- a/scripts/package/mkdebian > > > +++ b/scripts/package/mkdebian > > > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > > > #!/bin/sh > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > > # > > > # Copyright 2003 Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx> > > > # > > > @@ -160,12 +161,6 @@ Copyright: 1991 - 2018 Linus Torvalds an > > > The git repository for mainline kernel development is at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > > > > > - This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > > > - it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > > > - the Free Software Foundation; version 2 dated June, 1991. > > > - > > > -On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public > > > -License version 2 can be found in \`/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'. > > > EOF > > > > > > # Generate a control file > > > > Really sure that the generated deb copyright file should be changed ? > > (this text is not for the script itself, but the generated .deb) > > > > Anyways, this statement might not be fully correct, if not everything > > really is GPLv2. > > > > Oh, and I can't see any explicit statement that this script is gplv2. > > Oops, this scripts went a bit crazy here, this "GPL statement" is for > the autogenerated .deb file, not the license for the script itself. Indeed. > Thomas, you should add this to the "look at later" file. Done. > Well, it really should just get add to the "files with no license so > they get a GPLv2 tag added to them" pile, as that is what this one is. Correct. Thanks, tglx
