On 03.06.19 07:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > From: Thomas Gleixner tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): > > licensed under the terms of the gplv2 > > extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier > > GPL-2.0-only > > has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1 file(s). > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/linux-spdx.git/commit/?h=batch16&id=7b9d3940843d > --- > arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm63xx_smp.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm63xx_smp.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm63xx_smp.c > @@ -1,9 +1,8 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > /* > * Broadcom BCM63138 DSL SoCs SMP support code > * > * Copyright (C) 2015, Broadcom Corporation > - * > - * Licensed under the terms of the GPLv2 > */ > > #include <linux/delay.h> > Reviewed-By: Enrico Weigelt <info@xxxxxxxxx> By the way: does it still make sense to keep all the "copyright(c) ..." lines, or would should that information always be retrieved from git ? (for that particular file, git blame doesn't show anybody who seems to be from broadcom) Or should we introduce an SPDX header for that ? --mtx -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult Free software and Linux embedded engineering info@xxxxxxxxx -- +49-151-27565287
