Re: Meta-question on GPL compliance of this activity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:57:20PM -0400, John Sullivan wrote:
> Project copyrightholders can as always make their own decisions about
> questions like this. What Linux does will be looked to by others as a
> practice to model, so I'm interested to participate in the conversation
> here for that reason (I see there are also a few cases of actual FSF
> copyrighted materials up for consideration, so will try to watch for
> those but would also appreciate a ping if anyone can spare one as they
> come up).

To help address any issues that you might have with your own files being
modified, could you please just submit a patch to add the proper SPDX
header and place whatever text you feel is "correct" in them?  That way
you know your files are fine.

I'll gladly review and submit any patches you create for this, it would
be most helpful.  Same offer to any other copyright holder (Richard,
want to do this for all Red Hat owned files?)

Note, other copyright holders have already done this, you will note that
there are many subsystems/areas of the kernel that are already cleaned
up because of this.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux