I think this is the same situation (i.e. hold) as rule 204 -- reference to GPL without version number suggests 1.0-or-later, but reference to linux/COPYING suggests 2.0-only... On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:59 PM Allison Randal <allison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5/28/19 1:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > From: Thomas Gleixner tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): > > > > it is hereby placed under the terms of the gnu general public > > license see linux copying > > > > extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier > > > > GPL-2.0-only > > > > has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1 file(s). > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > No version number, should be GPL-1.0-or-later? > > Allison -- Steve Winslow Director of Strategic Programs The Linux Foundation swinslow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
