Agreed -- I have trouble feeling too concerned about it, but probably makes sense to include in the same bucket with the other weird disclaimers... On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:04 PM Allison Randal <allison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5/28/19 12:57 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > From: Thomas Gleixner tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): > > > > this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify > > it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as > > published by the free software foundation this program is > > distributed in the hope that it will be useful merchantability or > > fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license > > for more details > > > > extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier > > > > GPL-2.0-only > > > > has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 5 file(s). > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The disclaimer is weirdly mangled, but it doesn't add any additional > disclaimers, it just drops one line of text from the normal GPL > disclaimer. Still, it's probably worth holding for review with the other > special disclaimers. -- Steve Winslow Director of Strategic Programs The Linux Foundation swinslow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
