On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 9:51 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 09:37:50AM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: [...] > > Red Hat copyrights can be treated as GPL-2.0-or-later, if that is desired. > > > > [...] > > Are you sure you can do that? If the code was based on a work that was > from GPL-2.0-only you can't, right? :) Not sure I agree, but maybe not worth getting into on this list, or in this context anyway. > Please, let's not get into the "oh, you can change the license of all > files from company X" business with regards to these semi-automated > conversions. That's just going to add work and make things more > complex. > > Feel free to relicense your company's files at a later point in time, > just submit a patch to the kernel like any other developer :) Okay, fair enough! Henceforth I will not comment on GPLv2-only notices associated with Red Hat copyrights in these reviews. Richard
