On 5/24/19 8:33 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > That above 'as is' add-on to the short disclaimer looks innocent enough for > me, but then IANAL :) Nod, I think quite a few of these variants we'll ultimately decide can be removed because they are the same terms as the standard GPL disclaimer, even though the wording is slightly different. But, I also completely agree it's better to collect them all together, and then review them as a set, rather than making calls individually on-the-fly as we go. Allison
