On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:18 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Folks, > > first of all, thanks for your participation and help. Your review is truly > appreciated and the resulting discussions are definitely helpful for going > towards the final goal of a compliance friendly kernel tree. > > A few numbers: > > Number of patches/patterns reviewed: 125 > Number of patches/patterns sorted out: 19 > Number of patches/patterns found ok: 106 > > Number of files affected: 2010 > Number of deleted lines: 21631 > Number of deleted lines per file (average): 10.7 > Number of bytes removed: 1075891 Thanks for the stats. Nice to see bigger picture. :) > > If you are all comfortable with the daily dose of horrors to look at then > I'm going to continue sending batches of 25, but I'd be happy to up the > dose to 50 if you can handle it. :) I'm good to go to 50 so we can get through these quicker, but will defer to others. ;-) > > If you have any other suggestions for making this easier or better > structured, I'm happy to adjust the procedure. Thanks for adding the batch and rule number - it makes it easier to spot when I may have overlooked one as it bounces around my inbox with other viewers. Thank you for pulling all of this together into something that we can actually work through at a reasonable pace. Kate
