Re: Meta-question on GPL compliance of this activity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:33:22AM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > > IIUC, Thomas indicated in that thread that he could generate that information
> > > later, but given that we already have consensus on the idea, it seems to me
> > > it would be better if the patches themselves contained the moving of the
> > > notice text from the individual files into the single file, rather than
> > > reconstructing it on the back-end.  Richard, what do you think about that?
> 
> If I've followed these threads rightly it seems that this may not be a
> practical solution, but I think something like this would be
> preferable.

It's not practical in any way at all.  Again, please realize the size of
our code base.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux