Allison, On Fri, 10 May 2019, Allison Randal wrote: > On 5/9/19 10:56 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > I appreciate the +1, but I would appreciate even more some hint what you > > think is a digestible set size and how much time you think it takes to > > review such a set. You know that this is just a question of time. > > I'm fine with the 10-25/day you suggested, as long as I know to expect > them. I'll just do a quick run with my morning coffee. Personally, I'm > also fine if you just want to do all 500+ at once, and I'll work my way > through them in larger batches (dealing with several thousand emails a > day is not unusual for me, and these are quick reviews that don't need a > substantial reply). But, I suspect you're right that smaller batches > will be easier for most people. > > I will use the git URL to look at the actual changes, because my brain > is trained to think in diffs, but I'll only review the first few files > in each diff as a sample. I'm keeping the first few file diffs in the mail anyway, I just need to cutoff for the larger patches to avoid the size limit of the list. The URL is there for reference and for those who really want to look at every change :) Thanks, tglx
