On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 2:09 AM Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It's easy enough to add a test to only allow this on 'true' integer types
> like done in the patch.
We already linearize casts to different ops for the different cases
(integer/pointer/fp/bool). So yeah, we should do it at that level.
> Again it's easy enough to add some checks but I wonder if all this
> is really worth.
I agree. Remove it from the evaluation phase, and add it to the
linearized SSA format instead.
Note that even on RISC architectures that don't even _have_ truncated
operations (ie an "add" or "not" is always done on the whole
register), doing the truncation to minimal bits is worth it, because
it ends up being just a "upper bits don't matter" and will remove a
_lot_ of sign-extension or zero-extension crud.
So I think the simplification should be done, but I agree it's done in
the wrong place.
Once you do it at the instruction simplification level, all of the
confusion goes away, because a "cast to floating point" is a
fundamentally different operation than "zero-extend integer" at that
level.
Linus
