sparse annotation for error types?

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi!

Recently we've been getting a steady stream of patches from Changzhong
to fix missing assignment to error variables before jumping to error
cases.

I wonder if for new code it'd make sense to add an annotation for a type
which has to be returned non-zero?

What I have in mind is the following common flow:

int do_a_thing(struct my_obj *obj, int param)
{
	int err;

	err = first_step(obj, 1);
	if (err)
		return err;

	if (some_check(obj)) {
		err = -EINVAL; /* need explicit error set! */
		goto err_undo_1s;
	}

	err = second_step(obj, param);
	if (err)
		goto err_undo_1s;

	err = third_step(obj, 0);
	if (err)
		goto err_undo_2s;

	return 0;

err_undo_2s:
	second_undo(obj);
err_undo_1s:
	first_undo(obj);
	return err;
}


The variable err should never be returned when it's equal to 0.
So if we annotate it, let's say as:

	int __nzret err;

could sparse then warn if we forgot to assign it after
"if (some_check(obj))"? 

Am I the only one who thinks this would be a good idea?