On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:43:49 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote: > The static checker is fooled by the non-static locking scheme > implemented by the mentioned helpers. > Let's make its life easier adding some unconditional annotation > so that the helpers are now interpreted as a plain spinlock from > sparse. > > v1 -> v2: > - add __releases() annotation to unlock_sock_fast() > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied, thank you!
