The static checker is fooled by the non-static locking scheme
implemented by the mentioned helpers.
Let's make its life easier adding some unconditional annotation
so that the helpers are now interpreted as a plain spinlock from
sparse.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/net/sock.h | 9 ++++++---
net/core/sock.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 1d29aeae74fd..60d321c6b5a5 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1595,7 +1595,8 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk);
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
#define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock))
-bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk);
+bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+
/**
* unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast
* @sk: socket
@@ -1606,10 +1607,12 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk);
*/
static inline void unlock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk, bool slow)
{
- if (slow)
+ if (slow) {
release_sock(sk);
- else
+ __release(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+ } else {
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+ }
}
/* Used by processes to "lock" a socket state, so that
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 727ea1cc633c..9badbe7bb4e4 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -3078,7 +3078,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock);
*
* sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
*/
-bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
+bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
{
might_sleep();
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
@@ -3096,6 +3096,7 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here:
*/
mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+ __acquire(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
local_bh_enable();
return true;
}
--
2.26.2
