[PATCH 04/15] options: make Wsparse_error less special

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-Wsparse-error should not be enabled with -Wsparse-all, this is
special cased in the condition in loop handling -Wsparse-all.

However, the condition already handle warnings forced to off.
So instead of explicitly checking for &Wsparse_error, it's enough
to force Wsparse_error off.

Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 lib.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib.c b/lib.c
index 43d55a0648ee..9acdc60fc416 100644
--- a/lib.c
+++ b/lib.c
@@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ int Winit_cstring = 0;
 int Wint_to_pointer_cast = 1;
 int Wenum_mismatch = 1;
 int Wexternal_function_has_definition = 1;
-int Wsparse_error = 0;
 int Wmemcpy_max_count = 1;
 int Wnewline_eof = 1;
 int Wnon_pointer_null = 1;
@@ -296,6 +295,7 @@ int Wshadow = 0;
 int Wshift_count_negative = 1;
 int Wshift_count_overflow = 1;
 int Wsizeof_bool = 0;
+int Wsparse_error = WARNING_FORCE_OFF;
 int Wstrict_prototypes = 1;
 int Wtautological_compare = 0;
 int Wtransparent_union = 0;
@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ static char **handle_switch_W(char *arg, char **next)
 	if (!strcmp(arg, "Wsparse-all")) {
 		int i;
 		for (i = 0; warnings[i].name; i++) {
-			if (*warnings[i].flag != WARNING_FORCE_OFF && warnings[i].flag != &Wsparse_error)
+			if (*warnings[i].flag != WARNING_FORCE_OFF)
 				*warnings[i].flag = WARNING_ON;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.27.0




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux