Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS from environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:41:47PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On 2/12/19 9:36 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> > On 12/02/2019 20:12, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >> On 2/12/19 9:11 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> >>> On 12/02/2019 19:33, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >>>> Debian build scripts pass CFLAGS in the environment. To honor these only set
> >>>> CFLAGS to "-O2 -g" if CFLAGS is unset.

Last year or so, when I changed most of the makefile, I understood that
these were set only via the command line. But sure, it's certainly
convenient to set them via the env.

> >>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> --- a/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/Makefile
> >>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> >>>>  
> >>>>  
> >>>>  CC = gcc-8
> >>>> -CFLAGS = -O2 -g
> >>>> +CFLAGS ?= -O2 -g
> >>>>  CFLAGS += -Wall -Wwrite-strings
> >>>>  LD = $(CC)
> >>>>  LDFLAGS += -Wl,--as-needed
> >>>>

...

> >>> Otherwise, this does indeed make setting CFLAGS in the
> >>> environment easier and doesn't make setting it on the
> >>> command-line any worse, so ...

Indeed.

> >> Is this an Ack?
> > 
> > No. Just a mild encouragement to re-roll the patch on
> > a clean base.
> > 
> > Also, "The warnings in the following line are added
> > unconditionally." in the commit message is far from
> > clear. (when CFLAGS is set from the environment, the
> > += append happens without problem, but you seem to
> > be saying that these additions will be added from the
> > environment at the same time?)

It's OK to me if you need to change it to:
	CFLAGS ?= -O2 -g -Wall -Wwrite-strings
because the "-Wall -Wwrite-strings" create reproducibility
problems but, if only for my own curiosity, I would like
to understand what exactly the problem is.
 
> > Do you also set any other variables in the environment
> > (eg. LDFLAGS)?
> 
> Yes, the packages have the following variables set in their build
> environment: CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, FCFLAGS, FFLAGS, GCJFLAGS,
> LDFLAGS, OBJCFLAGS, OBJCXXFLAGS. Apart from CFLAGS these is no problem.

Yes but for me CC, LD, AR, PKG_CONFIG, ... MANDIR have potentially
exactly the same problem (except probably CHECKER_FLAGS that
could be considered as internal). but I have no problem to init
all of them with ?= like it was asked for PREFIX.

Best regards,
-- Luc



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux