On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For this instance, I think we should just revert the offending patch, > which should resolve the issue for everyone and then you can try to redo > your series to get it right the next time. > > Sound good? On one hand, "reverting & retrying" is a good default policy. On the other hand, we are already in -rc4 (i.e. we lose the testing done until now --- note that in this case the revert implies a global change). So whatever makes you guys feel more comfortable. Cheers, Miguel
