The pattern LSR(AND(x, M), S) is already generically simplified into ((x >> S) & (M >> S)) but only if the sub-expression AND(x, M) is not shared with some other expressions because the simplification modify it. But for some special cases the expression can be simplified even if the sub-expression is shared because the simplification doesn't need to modify this AND(x, M) part. Add the testcases for LSR and te incoming SHL. Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> --- validation/optim/lsr-and0.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ validation/optim/lsr-and1.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ validation/optim/shl-and0.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ validation/optim/shl-and1.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 validation/optim/lsr-and0.c create mode 100644 validation/optim/lsr-and1.c create mode 100644 validation/optim/shl-and0.c create mode 100644 validation/optim/shl-and1.c diff --git a/validation/optim/lsr-and0.c b/validation/optim/lsr-and0.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..292c0332f --- /dev/null +++ b/validation/optim/lsr-and0.c @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +unsigned lsr_and0(unsigned x) +{ + unsigned t = (x & 0x00000fff); + return (t >> 12) & t; +} + +/* + * check-name: lsr-and0 + * check-command: test-linearize -Wno-decl $file + * check-known-to-fail + * + * check-output-ignore + * check-output-contains: ret\\..*\\$0$ + */ diff --git a/validation/optim/lsr-and1.c b/validation/optim/lsr-and1.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..906d9946f --- /dev/null +++ b/validation/optim/lsr-and1.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +// If (t >> S) is simplified into (x >> S) +// then then whole expression will be 0. +// The test i sonly interesting if the sub-expression +// (x & M) is referenced more than once. +unsigned foo(unsigned x) +{ + unsigned t = (x & 0xfffff000); + return ((t >> 12) ^ (x >> 12)) & t; +} + +/* + * check-name: lsr-and1 + * check-command: test-linearize -Wno-decl $file + * check-known-to-fail + * + * check-output-ignore + * check-output-contains: ret\\..*\\$0$ + */ diff --git a/validation/optim/shl-and0.c b/validation/optim/shl-and0.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..63b20501c --- /dev/null +++ b/validation/optim/shl-and0.c @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +unsigned foo(unsigned x) +{ + unsigned t = (x & 0xfff00000); + return (t << 12) & t; +} + +/* + * check-name: shl-and0 + * check-command: test-linearize -Wno-decl $file + * check-known-to-fail + * + * check-output-ignore + * check-output-contains: ret\\..*\\$0$ + */ diff --git a/validation/optim/shl-and1.c b/validation/optim/shl-and1.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b7876e4e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/validation/optim/shl-and1.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +// If (t << S) is simplified into (x << S) +// then then whole expression will be 0. +// The test is only interesting if the sub-expression +// (x & M) is referenced more than once. +unsigned foo(unsigned x) +{ + unsigned t = (x & 0x000fffff); + return ((t << 12) ^ (x << 12)) & t; +} + +/* + * check-name: shl-and1 + * check-command: test-linearize -Wno-decl $file + * check-known-to-fail + * + * check-output-ignore + * check-output-contains: ret\\..*\\$0$ + */ -- 2.18.0