There is a potential problem when the second side of the OR
is simplified away.
Add 2 testcases to catch possible regressions here.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
validation/optim/and-or-crash.c | 5 +++++
validation/optim/and-or-mask.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 validation/optim/and-or-crash.c
create mode 100644 validation/optim/and-or-mask.c
diff --git a/validation/optim/and-or-crash.c b/validation/optim/and-or-crash.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..49440963c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/optim/and-or-crash.c
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+static int a(int b, unsigned c) { (c << 1 | b & 1 << 1) >> 1; }
+
+/*
+ * check-name: catch crashes during AND-OR simplifications
+ */
diff --git a/validation/optim/and-or-mask.c b/validation/optim/and-or-mask.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..468037895
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/optim/and-or-mask.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+int foo(int a, int b)
+{
+ return ((a & 7) | (b & 3)) & 8;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: and-or-mask
+ * check-command: test-linearize -Wno-decl $file
+ *
+ * check-output-start
+foo:
+.L0:
+ <entry-point>
+ ret.32 $0
+
+
+ * check-output-end
+ */
--
2.18.0
