Re: problem with signedness of PSEUDO_VALs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 22/07/18 21:26, Ramsay Jones wrote:
[snip]
>> +* shift instructions:
>> +	the type of the result must be the same as the type
>> +	of the left operand but the type of the right operand
>> +	is independent.
> 
> But for constant shifts, the shift direction can be flipped
> and the shift amount made non-negative, right?

Hmm, except that is not allowed by the C standard? (need to
check).

ATB,
Ramsay Jones


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux