Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] tpm: Add explicit endianness cast

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:57 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:09:12PM +0000, Thiebaud Weksteen wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:00 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 08:32:33AM +0000, Thiebaud Weksteen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:02 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:13:47PM +0200, Thiebaud Weksteen wrote:
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thiebaud Weksteen <tweek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog_of.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog_of.c
> > > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog_of.c
> > > > > > index 96fd5646f866..d74568d58a66 100644
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog_of.c
> > > > > > @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ int tpm_read_log_of(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > > > >        * but physical tpm needs the conversion.
> > > > > >        */
> > > > > >       if (of_property_match_string(np, "compatible",
"IBM,vtpm") <
> > 0) {
> > > > > > -             size = be32_to_cpup(sizep);
> > > > > > -             base = be64_to_cpup(basep);
> > > > > > +             size = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)sizep);
> > > > > > +             base = be64_to_cpup((__be64 *)basep);
> > > >
> > > > > Er, no.. change the definitions of sizep and basep to be __be
> > > >
> > > > > Jason
> > > >
> > > > Please read the comment before the condition. sizep and
> > > > basep may contain either little endian or big endian and this block
is
> > used
> > > > to adjust that. Let me know if there is a better way for handling
this.
> >
> > > Well a cast like that will throw sparse warnings, you need __force at
> > > least
> >
> > I don't think so. Since the variable is only defined as u32*, no
specific
> > warning is generated. I've used `make C=2 drivers/char/tpm/` with this
> > patch applied and no new warning is being triggered.

> I'm surprised to hear you say that..

> Sparse is supposed to require force on all cast that change the
> annotation, and there are many examples in the kernel that have force
> in that case.

> Jason

+linux-sparse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx for a sanity check.

If you look at the man page of sparse, under the bitwise option, it states:
"Sparse will warn on [...] any conversion of one restricted type into
another, except via a cast that includes __attribute__((force)).". In our
case, it is a conversion from unrestricted to restricted which does not
fall in this category.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux