Re: Reintroduce sparse-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:51 AM, Dibyendu Majumdar
<mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is it worth reintroducing sparse-next where more 'in-progress' changes
> are done? This will allow 'master' to be only for bug fixes or
> emergency fixes.

Either way is fine with me.

> I would also suggest having a way of tracking change / bug fix
> requests. Perhaps a Github mirror repository can be used just for this
> - i.e. use the issue tracker to help users raise bugs, and also allow
> users to vote on fixes or changes. I have seen some other projects
> doing this - i.e. the code in Github is simply a mirror, but issue
> tracker is used as a way of managing changes.

There is also a bugzilla at kernel.org for consideration.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux