Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@xxxxxxxxx>, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:00:42 -0800
Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-Sparse <linux-sparse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAHmME9r9xfzFb02H_E8Ri_tTY9mO-cWBFxrxifZLTYQ_KVvDgQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHmME9o02YNvfqV3RFofJE8FXwRaUACzq03TBADSYc74E02iBg@mail.gmail.com> <20170917100552.72288-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> <CAHmME9ofqdqwUsjmk9TSutFMOFGqstJo1rLuO7VOiC-OCRErGA@mail.gmail.com> <CAExDi1Qwc7MSRdDNAURFZNp3SLhWHaC0PKMfgpjVxeC3ZP8S+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAExDi1ST5ddB5Ti4rTOCdXsihc=xsuZ6riPAqvFCotrNmjUrUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHmME9qREfXRQb3ORwd7nyN2E-OTANRKpyirc6FkMON6T8fLOw@mail.gmail.com> <20180210200237.a4xmiyppshy5bbbk@ltop.local> <CANeU7QkhZix7xj4_pskyPUXSsSLX1qpXU98rJTf1BBBbxvCnXg@mail.gmail.com> <20180214000243.263hmp3puro4h4q3@ltop.local> <CAHmME9r9xfzFb02H_E8Ri_tTY9mO-cWBFxrxifZLTYQ_KVvDgQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0

On 02/14/2018 04:15 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
> 
> Could you apply those two patches, and then afterwards, cut a 0.5.2 release?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason

It would be useful for continuous kernel build bots to have the
"ignore indirect_branch attribute" patch as well.

thanks,
-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- Re: sparse with 4.10?
  - From: Jason A. Donenfeld
- [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
  - From: Luc Van Oostenryck
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
  - From: Jason A. Donenfeld
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
  - From: Luc Van Oostenryck
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
  - From: Luc Van Oostenryck
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
  - From: Jason A. Donenfeld
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
  - From: Luc Van Oostenryck
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
  - From: Christopher Li
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
  - From: Luc Van Oostenryck
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
  - From: Jason A. Donenfeld

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/5] IR: remove never-generated instructions
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] drop the concept of 'known-but-ignored' attributes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix missing evaluation when using '-include <file>'
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/6] dump macros definitions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Newbies FAQ] [LKML] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]