Re: [PATCH] fix implicit size of unsized arrays

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luc,

On 28 December 2017 at 21:40, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:20:41PM +0000, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
>> On 28 December 2017 at 21:19, Luc Van Oostenryck
>> <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:02:27PM +0000, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
>> >> Previous thread on this issue:
>> >>
>> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sparse/msg05427.html
>> >
>> > Ah yes, sorry, I forgot you already specifically reported this one.
>> >
>> > It should be fixed now.
>> >
>>
>> Well last time I thought the view was that a fix was not needed? What's changed?
>
> Another case which led to a better understanding of the situation.
>

I understood that the correct solution was for the symbol to hold the size.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sparse/msg05442.html
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sparse/msg05444.html


Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux