+linux-sparse On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 05:36:34AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:31:12AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 08:21:20PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 05:10:00PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > Yes, but this define is only #if __CHECKER__, so it doesn't matter what we > > > > return as this code will never run. > > > > > > It does matter slightly, as Sparse does some (very limited) value-based > > > analyses. Let's future-proof it. > > > > > > > That said, if sparse supports the GNU syntax of ?: then I have no > > > > objection to doing that. > > > > > > Sparse does support that syntax. > > > > Great, I'll fix that and resubmit. > > Except the context imbalance warning comes back if I do. This is sparse > 0.5.1 (Debian's 0.5.1-2 package). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
