Re: [PATCH] bug.h: Work around GCC PR82365 in BUG()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/19/2017 12:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

I suppose BUG() implies "dead end" like semantics - which ARC was lacking
before ?
Correct. Using __builtin_trap() here avoids the 'control reaches end of non-void
function' warnings, but then makes us run into the stack size problem that
I work around with the barrier_before_unreachable().

It would be good if you could give this a quick test to see if you get sensible
output from the __builtin_trap();

It does, added a BUG() arbit, hits an abort()

...
ISA Extn    : atomic ll64 unalign (not used)
        : mpy[opt 9] div_rem norm barrel-shift swap minmax swape
BPU        : partial match, cache:2048, Predict Table:16384
BUG: failure at ../arch/arc/mm/tlb.c:827/arc_mmu_init()!


Tested-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

FWIW newer ARC gcc actually implements the builtin so we get a trap 5 instruction now, vs., abort() calls before.

BTW I missed reading the hunk of your changelog where this addresses the long standing mystery with ARC builds and numerous -Wreturn-type warnings. I always wondered why they were not fixed upstream already, being too lazy to investigate myself, and turns out this was due to this BUG() thingy. phew !

-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux