Re: function designators & function pointers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Currently, sparse doesn't like those 'unneeded dereferences'.
> Do we want to accept them?

I think so. It is valid C after all.

> Do we want to warn on them (because they're really weird, unneeded
> and thus maybe the sign of some errors)?

Unneeded, yes.

Warning about it. I don't feel strongly either way. I guess we
can have a warning default to off.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux