Re: [PATCH 4/6] build: drop -g from LDFLAGS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -g is a compiler option that is ignored by the linker. So it should be
> included in CFLAGS (it already is) but not LDFLAGS.

Our linker "LD = gcc" so it might have impact on gcc as the finial
linking program?
I am actually not sure, I can be wrong.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux