[PATCH 09/15] add test case for bad layout of bool in bitfields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 validation/bitfield-bool-layout.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 validation/bitfield-bool-layout.c

diff --git a/validation/bitfield-bool-layout.c b/validation/bitfield-bool-layout.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4e0a2b4a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/bitfield-bool-layout.c
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+struct bfb {
+	_Bool a:1;
+	_Bool f:1;
+	_Bool z:1;
+};
+
+
+struct bfb foo(struct bfb s)
+{
+	return s;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: bitfield-bool-layout
+ * check-description: given that bool is here 1-bit wide
+ *	each field here above completely 'fill' a bool.
+ *	Thus 3 bools need to be allocated, but since the
+ *	alignment is 1-byte the result has a size of 3
+ *	bytes, 24 bits thus instead of 8.
+ * check-command: test-linearize -Wno-decl $file
+ *
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ * check-output-ignore
+ * check-output-excludes: ret\\.24
+ * check-output-contains: ret\\.8
+ */
-- 
2.14.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux