Re: Another code snippet that Sparse has problems with

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luc,

On 7 September 2017 at 02:31, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 12:05:58AM +0100, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
>> I recently found another test case that fails:
>>
>> static int test_do(void) {
>>     int a = 0;
>>     int count = 27;
>>     switch (count % 8) {
>>     case 0: do {  a++;
>>     case 7:       a++;
>>     case 6:       a++;
>>     case 5:       a++;
>>     case 4:       a++;
>>     case 3:       a++;
>>     case 2:       a++;
>>     case 1:       a++;
>>             } while ((count -= 8) > 0);
>>     }
>>     if (27 != a) return 1;
>>     return 0;
>> }
>

What's interesting is that I find that this code compiles OK with the
old SSA implementation, with or without single store short-cut, and
with out without simplifications.

But the newssa implementation ( your original sssa-mini) fails when
simplifications are turned on.

Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux