Re: [PATCH 0/7] put struct symbol & friends on diet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Meanwhile, I just looked at your numbers. At first sight, they look
> more or less as expected. I'm just surprised that the sys time is so
> high: around 45% of the user time (IIRC, in my measurements it was
> more like 10%, but I can be wrong).


For what is worth, I have rerun the test with less jobs:

Two run with -j6:

real 3m12.199s
user 12m47.617s
sys 5m30.896s

real 3m11.469s
user 12m44.292s
sys 5m29.944s

One run with one job:

real 14m21.460s
user 10m18.034s
sys 3m56.646s

As predicted, the system overhead come down dramatically with
less jobs. I think that sparse is the one with NR=29.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux