Re: [PATCH 0/3] -Wmemcpy-max-count & friends

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Ramsay Jones
<ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/17 21:27, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
>> sparse will warn if memcpy() (and some others memcpy-like
>> functions) is called with a very large static byte count.
>> But this warning cannot be disabled and the limit is arbitrary
>> fixed at 100000.
>>
>> The goal of this series is to allow to disable this warning if
>> found too unconvenient or to allow to configure its limit.
>>
>>
>> The series can also be found on the tree:
>>       git://github.com/lucvoo/sparse.git memcpy-max-count
>
> Heh, I think you know I wrote a similar patch about a decade ago ...
>
> [I tried to find it the other day but couldn't find it - I think
> it is on my old laptop, which doesn't get booted up these days!]

More or less, yes. I saw it in the email where you and Junio talked
about how this memset() warning was a bit blocking for git to use
sparse, which is the motivation of these 3 patches.

-- Luc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux