Hi Luc, On 29 March 2017 at 16:10, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > there are other infos stored in the SYM_NODE that *can't* be > stored in the symbol underneath it. I'm thinking about the exact type, > the modifiers, for example. You will soon or later need to handle > the SYM_NODE anyway; stripping it and trying to directly use the > base type under is in general wrong. > I am trying out an approach. If a SYM_NODE has a base type of SYM_NODE then which of the nodes should be used as the source for information you mention? Thanks and Regards Dibyendu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
