Re: Potential incorrect simplification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luc,

On 28 March 2017 at 15:11, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The first instruction and.32 refers to %r4 which is undefined.
>
> Yes, I saw.
> This %r4 corresponds (somehow) to s3 which isn't initialized.
>
> But yes, there is two problems here:
> *) we should use something explicit, like VOID
> *) there is a circulary dependence between %r3 & %r4, the first %r4
>    being obviously wrong.
>
> I suspect there is a lot of problems present once there is some
> undefined variables.
>

Well the unsimplified output is correct. The problem appears after
simplification.

Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux