On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, indeed. > I've some plan to add better handling of floating-point and the compare > is part of it. It'll need a new set of instructions to do it correctly > (precisely > because for fp numbers once you care about NaNs/unordered "a < b" is *not* > the same as "!(a >= b)"). > But there is also a number of bugs I want to solve, especially one related to > the misplacement of phi-node and another about missing reloads. For the moment > I think we can pretend that all the fp values we deal with are ordered ones. Can we detect it is the floating point type then avoid doing the compare swap for floating point? Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
