On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 06:00:33PM +0000, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote: > I got confused by the numbering initially as I was expecting all > pseudos within a single function to be numbered sequentially. Yes. I think they should, but in normal circonstances it doesn't matter. > So I should just read following : > > phisrc.64 %phi98(current) <- %r333 > > As: > > %phi98(current) = %r333 > > And 98 just happens to be the identifier for the pseudo, and 'phi' is > just to help the reader know that the value will go into a phi > instruction later. Is that correct? Absolutely. -- Luc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
