Re: __attribute__((force)) should not be a storage class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd suggest that either it should have exactly the same behavior as it does
> when applied to the type of a function argument (suppressing
> Sparse-specific pointer qualifier mismatches on input), or it should be
> prohibited entirely on standalone variable declarations.  I'd be fine
> with the latter, if you prefer.

BTW, patch are welcome to make it consistent, hopefully in a not too
complicate way.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux