On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 21:27 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > However, I would also like support for the context extensions, but I'm > not knowledgeable enough to describe the semantics accurately. Would > anyone be willing to file a ticket describing how the context extension > works well enough that it could be implemented? IMHO the context extension doesn't work well enough in sparse to document and implement as is. It would be much better if it actually was able to differentiate between contexts, rather than treating each one the same. This would avoid the problem that locking one lock and unlocking another (in the kernel's __acquire/ __release mechanism) could still result in a warning. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
