Re: [BUG report]sparse warnings on DEFINE_PER_CPU() symbols non-static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:43:20PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Does the following patch make it go away?
> 
> It should, but is there some reason why you couldn't make the definition
> on the line immediately below that static?

Weak symbols can't be static.  That's the point of the whole thing.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux