Re: [tip:sched/core 16/27] fs/jbd/commit.c:105:12: sparse: context imbalance in 'inverted_lock' - wrong count at exit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:47:20PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> That's expressible in Sparse; look at how spin_trylock and _cond_lock,
> and write a _cond_unlock.

Yeah, I know about __cond_lock() its an abomination that should die. I
did take a stab at teach sparse something saner but got stuck.. was
years ago, can't remember more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux