On 10/03/2012 01:44 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Daniel Santos wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@xxxxxxxxx>
> After this is folded into the previous patch in the series,
> "compiler{,-gcc4}.h: Remove duplicate macros", then:
>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks. I've actually just reversed the patch order per Josh's
suggestion and added patch comments to it. I can squash them if you
guys prefer.
Unfortunately, I'm a bit confused as to how I should re-submit these,
still being new to this project. Patch 1 is already in -mm. Patches 2-3
have not changed. I've made a correction to patch #4 and reversed the
order of 5 & 6. And what was 8-10 is now 8-15, as I've completely
re-done BUILD_BUG_ON. I was planning on just submitting the whole set
again, is this the correct protocol? If so, should I reply to the
original [PATCH 0/10] thread or create a new one?
Thanks!
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
