Re: suggestion for Merging LLVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 03:38 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>
>> So pasting the above test program tohttp://llvm.org/demo/  and
>> switching to "LLVM C++ API code" target seems to suggest you're
>> interested in the LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith() API for forward references.
>
> Sent pull req via github.
>
> List implementation is cheesy (inefficient if list ever gets woefully large)
> singly-linked list, but it is pretty simple.  Turned out that postponing
> LLVMAddIncoming() call works better than LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith() API:
>
>
> (warning: do not apply directly, patch is unfortunately word-wrapped; see
> pull request)

Pulled, thanks!

P.S. Could you please put your test cases under validation/backend?
It's really easy to make them part of regular "make check".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux